FLK1 · Contract
Frustration
SQE1 revision notes — the key rules, leading cases and common traps for this topic, in plain English and current to 2026.
CON.11 Frustration
Core idea. A contract is frustrated when, after formation, something happens — without the fault of either party — that makes performance impossible, illegal, or radically different from what was undertaken. The contract then automatically terminates at the moment of the frustrating event. No election is required; it is not a remedy a party chooses.
The test. The classic formulation (Davis Contractors v Fareham UDC [1956]): frustration occurs only where performance becomes "radically different" from what the parties bargained for. The bar is high — mere increased cost, difficulty or delay is not enough.
Categories (with leading cases):
- Impossibility — destruction of the subject matter: Taylor v Caldwell (1863) (music hall burned down); death/incapacity in personal-service contracts.
- Illegality (supervening) — performance becomes unlawful, e.g. by outbreak of war: Fibrosa v Fairbairn [1943].
- Frustration of common purpose — the event removes the whole point: Krell v Henry [1903] (coronation cancelled). Contrast Herne Bay v Hutton [1903] — purpose only partly defeated, not frustrated.
What does NOT frustrate (common traps):
- Self-induced frustration — caused by a party's own choice/breach: no relief (Maritime National Fish v Ocean Trawlers [1935]).
- Mere hardship / bad bargain / more expensive performance (Davis Contractors; Tsakiroglou v Noblee Thorl [1962] — Suez closure, alternative route still possible).
- Foreseen/foreseeable events, or risks the contract expressly allocates (e.g. a force majeure clause covering the event ousts frustration).
- A merely temporary interruption usually does not frustrate (assess against contract length).
Consequences — Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943:
- s.1(2): money paid before discharge is recoverable; money payable ceases to be payable. The court may allow the payee to retain/recover expenses incurred, up to the sum paid or payable before discharge (discretionary).
- s.1(3): where one party gained a valuable non-money benefit before discharge, the court may order a just sum for it.
- 1943 Act does not apply to certain contracts (e.g. carriage of goods by sea, insurance, s.7 SGA perished specific goods).
Distinctions to nail: frustration = post-formation event; common mistake = facts wrong at formation. Don't confuse the Davis "radically different" test with breach — frustration is no-fault and automatic.
More Contract topics
- Formation — offer & acceptance
- Consideration & intention to create legal relations
- Privity & third-party rights
- Terms — express, implied, interpretation
- Exemption clauses & unfair terms (UCTA / CRA 2015)
- Misrepresentation
See all topics in the FLK1 guide or the full SQE1 syllabus.
Independent SQE1 revision notes for study — not legal advice; check primary sources before relying on any point. Exam rules are set by the SRA; see the official SQE site.