FLK1 · Contract

Formation — offer & acceptance

SQE1 revision notes — the key rules, leading cases and common traps for this topic, in plain English and current to 2026.

CON.01 — Formation: Offer & Acceptance

A contract needs offer + acceptance + consideration + intention to create legal relations + certainty. This note covers offer and acceptance.

Offer

An offer is a clear statement of terms made with intention to be bound on acceptance. Test it objectively (Smith v Hughes): would a reasonable person think the offeror intended to be bound?

Distinguish an offer from an invitation to treat (a willingness to negotiate, not an offer):

  • Shop displays / goods on shelves — invitation to treat; offer is made by the customer at the till (Fisher v Bell; PSGB v Boots).
  • Advertisements — usually invitations to treat (Partridge v Crittenden), but a unilateral offer if a clear promise + condition (Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co — deposit of £1,000 showed intent).
  • Auctions — the bid is the offer; the auctioneer's request is an invitation to treat. Without reserve = unilateral offer to highest bidder (Barry v Davies).
  • Tenders — invitation to treat; the tender is the offer (but obligation to consider conforming bids).

Termination of an offer

  • Revocation — any time before acceptance, but must be communicated (Byrne v Van Tienhoven). Communication by a reliable third party suffices (Dickinson v Dodds). A unilateral offer cannot be revoked once performance has begun (Errington v Errington).
  • Rejection / counter-offer — a counter-offer kills the original (Hyde v Wrench). A mere request for information does not (Stevenson v McLean).
  • Lapse — of time, or death.

Acceptance

Unqualified assent to all terms. Key rules:

  • Must be communicated to the offeror; silence is not acceptance (Felthouse v Bindley).
  • Acceptance must match the offer (mirror image); "battle of the forms" usually decided by last set of terms (Butler Machine Tool).
  • Postal rule — acceptance is effective when posted, not received (Adams v Lindsell) — only if post was reasonable and not excluded; does not apply to instantaneous communication (Entores; Brinkibon).
  • Unilateral contracts — acceptance is by performing the act; no separate communication needed (Carlill).

Common SBAQ traps

  • Treating a shop display/advert as an offer.
  • Forgetting revocation must reach the offeree before acceptance.
  • Misapplying the postal rule to email/telex (instantaneous = receipt rule).
  • Counter-offer vs request for information.
  • Battle-of-the-forms: identify who fired the "last shot".

More Contract topics

See all topics in the FLK1 guide or the full SQE1 syllabus.

Independent SQE1 revision notes for study — not legal advice; check primary sources before relying on any point. Exam rules are set by the SRA; see the official SQE site.