FLK1 · Contract

Terms — express, implied, interpretation

SQE1 revision notes — the key rules, leading cases and common traps for this topic, in plain English and current to 2026.

CON.04 — Terms: Express, Implied, Interpretation

Term or representation?

A statement is a term (breach gives a contractual remedy) or a mere representation (only a misrepresentation claim). Factors: timing, importance attached, special knowledge/skill of the maker, and whether the statement was reduced to writing.

Routledge v McKay — long gap before contract suggested representation.
Oscar Chess v Williams (private seller, no special knowledge → representation) vs Dick Bentley v Harold Smith (dealer's skill → term).

Incorporation of express terms

Signature: bound even if unread (L'Estrange v Graucob), unless misrepresented (Curtis v Chemical Cleaning).
Notice: reasonable steps before/at contracting; the more onerous the clause, the greater the notice needed (Interfoto "red hand" rule; Thornton v Shoe Lane — ticket from machine, too late).
Course of dealing: consistent prior dealings (Hollier — too few/inconsistent failed).
Parol evidence rule: written contract presumed complete; rebuttable by collateral contract or partly-oral contracts.

Implied terms

By fact (to give business efficacy / officious bystander; The Moorcock; Marks & Spencer v BNP Paribas — strict necessity test, NOT reasonableness).
By law (incidents of a contract type, e.g. landlord/tenant: Liverpool CC v Irwin).
By statute — Sale of Goods Act 1979, for every sale except a trader-to-consumer contract (which the Consumer Rights Act 2015 governs: SGA ss.12(7), 13(5), 14(9), 15(5)): s.12 title, s.13 description and s.15 sample apply whoever the seller is; s.14 satisfactory quality and fitness for purpose apply only where the seller sells in the course of a business (s.14(2), (3)), so a private seller gives no implied quality term (s.14(1)) unless selling through a business agent without the buyer knowing or being told (s.14(5)). Consumer Rights Act 2015 governs B2C: s.9 satisfactory quality, s.10 fitness, s.11 description, s.49 reasonable care/skill in services. Do not cite SGA for consumers — that is a classic trap.

Classification & interpretation

Condition (breach → terminate + damages), warranty (damages only), innominate term (remedy depends on seriousness of consequences — Hong Kong Fir). Time clauses in commercial sales often conditions (The Mihalis Angelos).
Construction: objective, contextual, business-common-sense approach (Investors Compensation Scheme; Rainy Sky; Arnold v Britton — but clear words prevail over commercial common sense; Wood v Capita — iterative).

Common traps

Term vs representation drives the whole remedy route.
Innominate terms ≠ automatic right to terminate.
CRA 2015 applies only where a trader supplies a consumer (s.1(1)); a private sale between two consumers falls under SGA 1979, not the CRA.
Implied-in-fact = necessity, never mere reasonableness.

Try a real SQE1 question

This question is taken from the bank. Answer it to see the worked reasoning and the tutor. You do not need to sign up to try it.

In January, a doctor negotiating the sale of his medical practice tells the buyer, truthfully, that the practice generates around £2,000 a month in income. Contracts are not signed until May. Between January and May the doctor falls seriously ill, stops practising, and the patient list collapses, so that by the time of signing the practice earns almost nothing. The doctor says nothing about this change. The buyer, still relying on the January figure, completes the purchase and then discovers the true position.

Practise at the real standard

Strong on this topic? SQE1 tests 137 of them, and 58% did not pass in July 2026. See where you stand across all of them.

Complete includes

✓An AI tutor on every question. The tutor already knows the correct answer
✓5 full timed mock papers, plus unlimited drilling — no daily cap
✓The whole 2,263-question bank, with worked answers and references, all 137 topics
✓Your weak-spot map: exactly where you’re losing marks

See what it costs →or try 25 questions free

One payment, nothing recurring. The 25-question diagnostic is free with no card.