FLK1 · Business Law & Practice

Legal personality & limited liability

SQE1 revision notes — the key rules, leading cases and common traps for this topic, in plain English and current to 2026.

BLP.02 — Legal Personality & Limited Liability

Core principle

On incorporation a company becomes a separate legal person distinct from its members and directors (Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22; CA 2006 s.16(2)). It can own property, contract, sue and be sued, and continues in perpetual succession regardless of changes in membership.

Consequences of separate personality:

  • The company's assets are its own — members have no proprietary interest in them (Macaura v Northern Assurance [1925] — shareholder had no insurable interest in company property).
  • The company contracts in its own name; a director is not personally liable on company contracts merely as an agent acting within authority.
  • A sole shareholder/director who is also an employee can sue/be a creditor of the company (Lee v Lee's Air Farming [1961]).

Limited liability

Separate personality ≠ limited liability — they are distinct concepts. Limited liability protects the members, not the company. The company is always fully liable for its own debts.

  • Company limited by shares (s.3(2)): member's liability is capped at any amount unpaid on their shares. If shares are fully paid, the member owes nothing further on insolvency.
  • Company limited by guarantee (s.3(3)): members guarantee a nominal sum payable on winding up (common for charities/clubs).
  • Unlimited company (s.3(4)): members fully liable.

Piercing the corporate veil

Courts respect separate personality and rarely look behind it. Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] UKSC 34 confined veil-piercing to the narrow "evasion principle": where a person under an existing legal obligation deliberately interposes a company to evade it or frustrate enforcement. Distinguish the "concealment principle" (look at who really controls — not true piercing). On the facts in Prest, assets were reached via resulting/constructive trust, not veil-piercing (Adams v Cape Industries [1990] confirms the high threshold).

Common traps for SQE1

  • Don't conflate separate legal personality (a feature of every registered company) with limited liability (depends on company type).
  • A company has personality only from the date on the certificate of incorporation (s.16) — pre-incorporation contracts bind the promoter personally (s.51), even if signed "for and on behalf of" the company.
  • Veil-piercing is a last resort — only if no conventional remedy (agency, trust, tort, fraud) is available, and only on the evasion principle.
  • Directors can incur personal liability separately — e.g. personal guarantees, fraudulent/wrongful trading (IA 1986 ss.213–214), breach of duty, or tortious acts they personally commit. This is not piercing the veil.
  • Group companies: each subsidiary is a separate person; a parent is not liable for subsidiary debts absent a recognised basis (Adams v Cape).

More Business Law & Practice topics

See all topics in the FLK1 guide or the full SQE1 syllabus.

Independent SQE1 revision notes for study — not legal advice; check primary sources before relying on any point. Exam rules are set by the SRA; see the official SQE site.